Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Jones v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
B. True, United States Attorney General, Attorney General for the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simmermaker v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2020cv01671
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution, Canten, U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Simmermaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitrano v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv00859
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv02112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aldridge v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2010cv00187
Petitioner:
James E. Aldridge, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Rene Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wardell v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2008cv00176
Plaintiff:
Wendel Robert Wardell, Jr.
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Troy A. Eid, Matthew T. Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springs v. United States Attorney General
as 1:2007cv02093
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jerome Springs
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szymanski v. USPC, et al
as 1:2000cv01232
Petitioner:
Eugene Szymanski
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission , Janet Reno , United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
