Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,744
Bell v. USA
as 2:2024cv11667
Petitioner: Devantae Bell
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Albers #15580-040 v. United States
as 1:2024cv00649
Petitioner: David Scott Albers #15580-040
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rankin v. USA
as 2:2024cv11620
Petitioner: John Rankin
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kennedy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00639
Petitioner: Zachary John Kennedy
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edenburn v. USA
as 4:2024cv11514
Petitioner: Ryan Neal Edenburn
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00609
Petitioner: Roddrick Montez Wilson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rupp v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00583
Petitioner: Joshua Louis Rupp
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11421
Petitioner: Juan Ramirez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DiMambro v. Howard
as 2:2024cv11419
Petitioner: Ronald Anthony DiMambro, Jr.
Respondent: United States Eastern District, People of and Jeffrey Howard
Mims v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00552
Petitioner: Tommy Terrell Mims
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?