Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02452
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HUNTER v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01787
Plaintiff: STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Defendant: WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, A/W OF MEDICAL CENTRAL PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00934
Plaintiff: WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant: TERRENCE W. BOYLE, DONALD HICKS, RAYNARD T. FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff: DEMARCUS DEON CRAWFORD
Defendant: WEST TENNESSEE DETENTION FACILITY, HUGH HARVEY, JR., JODY S. PICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORBEY v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff: MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Defendant: WILLIAMS, FORREN, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA et al
as 1:2021cv03221
Petitioner: MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent: WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAWSON v. BOYLE et al
as 1:2021cv02963
Plaintiff: WILLIAM DAWSON
Defendant: TERRENCE W. BOYLE and BRYAN K. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02174
Respondent: Hon THOMAS W. HARKER and RANDALL LAMOUREUX
Petitioner: NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. MCCARTHY
as 1:2021cv02185
Petitioner: AARON W. WILSON
Respondent: RYAN MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff: MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant: DAN JOHNSON and DAVID W FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?