Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Lavender
as 2:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff George W. Lavender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 3:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Theodore Smith, III and Theodore W. Smith, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden May, RWO Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 1:2018cv01860
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith, III v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2018cv01493
Defendant:
Deputy Warden of Special Operations Bebee, Doctor Doe, Food Service Supervisor Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore W. Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, III v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Theodore W. Smith, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Bebee, Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, III v. Correctional Officer Bingham
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Theodore W. Smith, III
Defendant:
Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 3:2016cv00308
Petitioner:
Theodore W Smith, III
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smith v. USA
as 1:2016cv01396
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Steven W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 3:2013cv00065
Petitioner:
Theodore W Smith, III
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden Franklin Medical Center
as 1:2012cv00196
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Franklin Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
