Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gray v. Dicky et al
as 4:2022cv00258
Plaintiff: Terry D Gray
Defendant: Wayne Dicky, Paul Martinez, Kevin Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waggoner v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00887
Plaintiff: The Undersigned Prisoners and Loyde D Waggoner
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Anderson et al
as 4:2009cv00162
Plaintiff: Demetra Brumfield
Defendant: Dee Anderson, T Shanklin, Med American Food Service and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waggoner v. Vowel et al
as 1:2009cv00003
Petitioner: Bruce Waggoner
Respondent: NFN Vowel and Jeff Pringle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waggoner v. Rowlett
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: NFN Rowlett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waggoner v. Dieken et al
as 1:2007cv00189
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: Jack Dieken, NFN Havens and FNU Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waggoner v. Dieken et al
as 1:2007cv00171
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: Jack Dieken, K Graham and NFN Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waggoner v. Dieken et al
as 1:2007cv00168
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: Jack Dieken, K Graham, NFN Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waggoner v. Dieken et al
as 1:2007cv00158
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: Jack Dieken, K Graham and B Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waggoner v. Dieken et al
as 1:2007cv00157
Plaintiff: Bruce Waggoner
Defendant: Jack Dieken, K Graham and B Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?