Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Strong v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv04166
Respondent:
Warden Reyes
Petitioner:
Thomas Richard Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Mattson
as 4:2024cv04163
Respondent:
Warden Mattson
Petitioner:
Billy Tyler Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04131
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Petitioner:
Brad McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04132
Petitioner:
Cordell Wilson
Defendant:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Bittinger et al
as 4:2024cv04152
Defendant:
Warden Teresa Bittinger and Medical Dept.
Plaintiff:
Lemuel R. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wong v. Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
as 4:2024cv04117
Petitioner:
Eugene Ka Lok Wong
Respondent:
Warden, Yankton Federal Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Timmons v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Respondent:
Warden Alejandro Reyes and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
David Paul Timmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2024cv05051
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Warden Daniel Sullivan
Petitioner:
Harry David Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whirlwind Horse v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04105
Respondent:
Marty Jackley and Warden Alex Reyes
Petitioner:
Michael R. Whirlwind Horse, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04123
Petitioner:
Breyon Wilbert Brown
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
