Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Wilkins v. People of California
as 4:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Keith Wilkins
Defendant:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy D. Wilkins v. E. Lozano et al
as 2:2023cv09163
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
E. Lozano, M. Benetes, Santiago Olmos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilkins v. Farris et al
as 2:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Keith Wilkins
Defendant:
K. Farris, T. McCoard and N. Fujiwara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Superior Court of California et al
as 3:2023cv03913
Petitioner:
Deon McNeil Wilkins
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, D.A. and Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilkins v. Baker
as 4:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
B. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wilkins v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv01662
Plaintiff:
Keith Wilkins
Defendant:
D. Garland, M. Jordan, M. Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy D. Wilkins v. Holcolm et al
as 2:2022cv03608
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
Holcolm, J. Hernandez, S. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy D. Wilkins v. D. Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
D. Samuels, B. Phillips, S. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. White et al
as 4:2021cv02928
Defendant:
Judge Richard Seeborg, Judge Joseph C. Spero, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy D. Wilkins v. Correctional Officers et al
as 2:2021cv03383
Defendant:
Lund, Angelo Dolida, D. Maner and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
