Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Durbin, Sr. v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Che Durbin, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas L. Wolfe, Chesapeake Dentention Center, Unknown Corrections Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Richard C Washington
Defendant:
T Wolfe, Stephawn Tate, Matthew Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Medley v. Wolfe
as 1:2023cv02568
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Medley
Defendant:
Thomas L. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00880
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00879
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Deputy Wolfe
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Greg Eric Wallace and Gregg Eric Wallace
Defendant:
Deputy Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. BCBIC Officer Elliott et al
as 1:2022cv03315
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Black
Defendant:
BCBIC Officer Elliott, BCBIC Officer Nenyioma and CDF Warden Thomas L Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wolfe
as 1:2022cv03130
Plaintiff:
Dorrell C. Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Thomas Wolfe and Personell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Tavon Williams
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Thomas Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
