Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Fordham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00566
Defendant:
J. Dignus, A. Reynolds, R. Cochrane and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamar Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deans v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00480
Defendant:
Lois Fegan, J. Hampton, Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Donshea O. Deans, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koob v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00451
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, J. Barnett, M.J. Blaha and others
Plaintiff:
Igor Koob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00051
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Clifford Wayne Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Brown, DDS, et al.
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
J. Brown, DDS and L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Woods et al
as 7:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Woods, Osborne, S. Gullett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deegan v. Hutcheson et al
as 7:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael John Deegan
Defendant:
Bryan F. Hutcheson, Michelle Woods, Alicia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Patrick County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Palmer
Defendant:
Patrick County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Kenny, Deputy Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Pozeg et al
as 7:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Defendant:
Michael Pozeg, Larry Meadows, J. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
