Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Folts
as 4:2023cv03234
Plaintiff:
Valeisha Walker
Defendant:
Angela Folts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
Leondre Walker
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Tecumseh State Institution et al
as 4:2022cv03150
Plaintiff:
Leondre Walker
Defendant:
Tecumseh State Institution and Rasmussen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Paine et al
as 8:2017cv00044
Respondent:
Penny Gregg, Kurt Kapperman, Anne Paine and others
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luckett v. Walker
as 8:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Alvin Luckett
Defendant:
Greg Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulsen v. Foxall et al
as 8:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Barbee, Earley, Dr. Foxall and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Paulsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovette v. Houston et al
as 4:2014cv03056
Respondent:
Brian Gage and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Marvin Walker Lovette
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. USA
as 4:2013cv03106
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2011cv00253
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Leondre Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mumin v. Ameji et al
as 8:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Basher M. Ahmed Ameji, Judy Weiss, John Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
