Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Betschart et al v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
Walter Betschart, Joshua Shane Bartlett, Caleb Aiona and others
Respondent:
Sheriff Patrick Garrett, Washington County Circuit Court Judges and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Moore
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Oregon Dept of Corrections, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 6:2015cv00521
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Corizon Health, Inc., Trang Tran and others
Plaintiff:
Hodges and David Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canha v. Jackson County Oregon et al
as 1:2019cv01708
Defendant:
Jackson County Oregon and Sheriff Walter Haussner
Plaintiff:
Steven Louis Canha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Kevin I. Foust, Unknown FBI DTOU UC, Maureen E. Mazzolla and others
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werby v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01828
Defendant:
John & Jane Does, Colette Peters, R. LeGore and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Werby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. USA
as 3:2016cv01202
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Allen Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00727
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hoopes v. USA
as 3:2016cv00276
Petitioner:
Ben Walter Hoopes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
