Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hagerman v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark Hagerman
Defendant:
NDOC, Kitchen Sgt, Food Service Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Warden HDSP et al
as 2:2023cv01280
Petitioner:
Mathew Young
Respondent:
Warden HDSP and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Warden HDSP et al
as 2:2023cv00980
Petitioner:
Dontae Mathis
Respondent:
Warden HDSP and State of Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dzik v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dzik
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coil v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
David Coil
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Governor Sandoval, Governor Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dzik v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01982
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dzik
Defendant:
Johnson, Steve Sisolak, Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCain v. Medical Doctors HDSP et al
as 2:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Aaron McCain
Defendant:
Medical Doctors HDSP, Director of Nursing and Warden HDSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv01364
Defendant:
H Landsman, James Dzurenada, Warden HDSP and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malcolm Gray v. Dwight Neven
as 17-15572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM L. GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, Warden HDSP
Malcolm Gray v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-15364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALCOLM L. GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, Warden HDSP, GREG COX, SHERYL FOSTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
