Cases 1 - 10 of 37
(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Brothers et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Warner Brothers and Leonardo DiCaprio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Bros et al
as 2:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Warner Bros, US Air Force, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. St. Andre
as 3:2022cv02916
Petitioner:
Ryan Scott Warner
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Zachary Castaneda v. Sony Television et al
as 8:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Zachary Castaneda
Defendant:
Sony Television, Lions Gate Event, Comcast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06555
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, Time, Inc. and Time-Warner, Celtic and Laker of NBA and others
Defendant:
Watson, Parole Hearing, Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Day v. Watson et al
as 2:2020cv06045
Plaintiff:
Morris Day, L.A. County Times Warner, Rickey Louis Alford and others
Defendant:
John Doe I, Municipal Court Corporation, Sheriff Deputy Servillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Ugbor
as 3:2018cv02199
Plaintiff:
Warner Livingston
Defendant:
D. Ugbor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon, Jr. v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Alvarez, B. Williams, M. Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Stoller et al
as 2:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
M. Stoller, Arrellano, M. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Stoller et al
as 4:2016cv04762
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
M. Stoller, Arrellano, M. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
