Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Washington v. USA
as 5:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hall v. Washington County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv03742
Plaintiff:
JaQuan L Hall
Defendant:
Washington County Jail, Officer Joshua Elliott, Officer T.J. Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Stormer
as 5:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Washington
Defendant:
Judge Elinore Stormer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Washington v. USA
as 1:2022cv00593
Petitioner:
William Pierce Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Washington v. Cool
as 3:2022cv01634
Petitioner:
Darius Washington
Respondent:
Warden Willaim Cool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Lake Erie Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv01386
Petitioner:
Bobby L. Washington and James Summers
Respondent:
Lake Erie Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. USA
as 5:2022cv01112
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Washington
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. State of Ohio, et al
as 5:2021cv02003
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Washington
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Akron Police Department and Akron Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Cuyahoga County Jail
as 1:2021cv02002
Petitioner:
Bobby L. Washington and James Summers
Respondent:
Cuyahoga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
