Cases 1 - 10 of 256
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Defendant:
John Doe, Shirley Coody, LSP Investigation Service and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wayne McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Bottley
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant:
Jarrob Bottley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaglin v. Torres
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Moses Wayne Eaglin
Defendant:
Paul A Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogbebor v. Hardy et al
as 6:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Edosa Addley Festus Ogbebor
Defendant:
Kenneth Hardy, Tyler Daigle, Jacob Ortego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Keith Robertson and Keith Wayne Robertson
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and Asst Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Paretti et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Primus
Defendant:
Captain Paretti, Lieutenant Moore, Sergeant Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 6:2023cv01797
Petitioner:
Wayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guillory v. Borel et al
as 2:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Guillory, Jr.
Defendant:
Jaze Borel, Trent Lottinger, Jordan Darcey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Hooper
as 5:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Holder
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Justin J Mark
Defendant:
Edward D. Bickham, Wayne Aucoin, Edward Bickham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
