Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Burghy et al
as 2:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Captain Burghy, Officer Cowgill, Officer Sheppard and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Coleman and J'Kuan Maleek Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00944
Petitioner:
John Wells
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ellord Wells v. Michelle Miller
as 1:2015cv01239
Petitioner:
Ellord Wells
Respondent:
Michelle Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wells v. Miller
as 1:2015cv00951
Petitioner:
Ellord Wells
Respondent:
Michelle Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
