Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Vandenrandt et al
as 4:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Kelsie Raymond Whitten, Jr.
Defendant:
Amber Vandenrandt and UTMB Cole Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. White et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Attorney General New Mexico, Attorney General Arizona, San Diego County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Catoe et al
as 6:2018cv00429
Defendant:
Deadra Martin, Jeffery W Catoe, Jeffery Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Davis
as 1:2017cv01176
Respondent:
Director Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
William Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Director TDCJ
as 9:2016cv00029
Petitioner:
Eddie Ray Whitten
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nickerson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2012cv00761
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division, Guillermo Delarosa, Stephen Farquhar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Delarosa et al
as 6:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
Guillermo Delarosa, Stephen Farquhar, Donald Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2011cv00517
Petitioner:
Eddie Ray Whitten
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roney v. Sgt Flowers et al
as 6:2011cv00498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shante Roney
Defendant:
Sgt Flowers, Derrick Whitten, Ms Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
