Cases 1 - 10 of 37
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. TILLMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN, MOBB SHIT MONSTA, MONSTRO MONSTA and others
Defendant:
DEPUTY TILLMAN, DEPUTY WILEY, WARDEN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Askew v. Wiley et al
as 1:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Robert Askew
Defendant:
Deputy Wiley, Deputy Pearson, Deputy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and SHERIFF WILEY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sean T. Wiley
Defendant:
United States of America, Correction Officer Newel, Dr. Chadick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STEPHENS et al
as 5:2021cv00396
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER STEPHENS, WARDEN IVY, DEXTER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Forsyth County
as 2:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Wiley Joe Scruggs
Defendant:
Forsyth County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Forsyth County
as 2:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Wiley Joe Scruggs
Defendant:
Forsyth County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILEY v. WARD et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Respondent:
Timothy C. Ward, State of Georgia and WARDEN MEOSHA MCMILLAN
Petitioner:
CRYSTAL D WILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
