Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Jones v. Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02433
Plaintiff:
Travis Everett Jones
Defendant:
Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland, T. Richardson, Commissioner Hesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Crouse v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Adam Travis Crouse
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Officer Hague and All of Intel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. Vendeze et al
as 1:2022cv02848
Plaintiff:
Brent Leland Arthur
Defendant:
John Vendeze, Michael Kolhouse, Nobel Parosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Travis Terry
Defendant:
Jeff Nines, COII Shaffer, COII Mootes and others
Interested Party:
Maryland Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Burroughs v. Phinn et al
as 1:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Travis Damon Burroughs
Defendant:
Judge Melissa Phinn, DA Robert Render, Judge Yolanda Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry v. Frank Bishop et al
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Travis Terry
Respondent:
Frank Bishop, Vicki Ballou-Watts, Anne Marie Gerring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crouse v. Officer Ryan Alba
as 1:2021cv03104
Plaintiff:
Adam Travis Crouse
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Alba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lee-El v. State of Maryland
as 1:2021cv01865
Petitioner:
Travis E. Lee-El
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christian v. Warden
as 1:2021cv01301
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
Travis Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
