Cases 1 - 10 of 7,741
Williams v. LNU
as 3:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mozingo v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mozingo
Defendant:
Dana Sullivan, Brian Sullivan, Laundry Capitan Jesus Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovings v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Defendant:
Harris County Jail S Ed Gonzalez, R Savage and Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Junes et al
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Defendant:
Judge Steven Junes, District Attorney Phil Sorrells, Bill Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
