Cases 1 - 10 of 7,741
Williams v. LNU
as 3:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrera v. Rush et al
as 7:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Armando Barrera, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge James Rush, Dusty Gallivan, Melissa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coppola v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Coppola and Iron Thunderhorse
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovings v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Defendant:
Harris County Jail S Ed Gonzalez, R Savage and Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mozingo v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mozingo
Defendant:
Dana Sullivan, Brian Sullivan, Laundry Capitan Jesus Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Junes et al
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Defendant:
Judge Steven Junes, District Attorney Phil Sorrells, Bill Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Sheriff Clint McRae, Sheriff Keith Dehart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Captain Williams, Sargent Dixon, Pearl Legendre Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
