Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stephens v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00360
Plaintiff:
Jessica Stephens
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, William Duncan and Ciffton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Stanislaus County et al
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Stanislaus County, Mark Puthuff, Adam Christianson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 2:2011cv01166
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 1:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen, Jr v. Christianson et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Allen Columbus, Jr
Defendant:
Adam Christianson, Gina Leguria, William Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney G Holder v. William Duncan et al
as 2:2007cv03401
Petitioner:
Rodney G Holder
Respondent:
William Duncan, Edmund G Brown, Jr, Christopher Totten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Kernan et al
as 2:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, James Tilton, Suzan Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cramer v. Duncan
as 5:2007cv00829
Plaintiff:
Billy Elemvel Cramer
Defendant:
William Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER-V-DUNCAN
as 5:2007cv00621
Petitioner:
Billy Elemvel Cramer
Defendant:
William Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory v. Duncan, et al
as 1:1998cv06521
Petitioner:
Edwin Gregory
Respondent:
William Duncan and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
