Cases 1 - 10 of 67
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SIMMONS et al v. EDWARDS et al
as 7:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EUGENE SIMMONS, JR, DEVANTE NELSON, KUNTA K WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR, JUDGE ELLEN GOLDEN, SOLICITOR JUSTO CABRAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. KEMP et al
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY Secured Party doing business as GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CORNEILUS WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Whittington
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Maurice Corneilus Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Lawrence Whittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik Bey v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Abdul Malik Bey and Grady Revard Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Brian Kemp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
