Cases 1 - 10 of 882
(PC) Bennett v. Gocke et al
as 2:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Joseph Gockey, Elray Henry, Wenneker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01578
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Weaver v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv01162
Petitioner:
Willie Weaver
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bennett v. FBI, et al
as 2:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Willis, Henrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California and California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2024cv01855
Petitioner:
Willie Weaver
Respondent:
Warden Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
