Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wood v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Wood
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, Michael Myers, Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00470
Petitioner:
Joseph Wood, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lightfeather v. Green et al
as 8:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Julie, Lauren Gaylord Baired, Brenda Mae Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yonli v. United States of America et al
as 8:2021cv00185
Respondent:
Darrell R. Woods, Kirsten Nielsen, Paul Capiahioni and others
Petitioner:
Yonli Ibrahim and Ibrahim Yonli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lightfeather v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Tony Vargas, Pete Ricketts, Kate Bowls and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfeather v. PornHub.com et al
as 8:2021cv00146
Defendant:
Buttman, Google.com, Brenda Mae Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfeather v. Woods et al
as 8:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Jevon Woods and Black Lives Matter Movement
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Correction Care Solutions et al
as 8:2017cv00014
Defendant:
Correction Care Solutions and Lancaster County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael James Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00443
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eddie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
