Cases 1 - 10 of 57
WORTHEN v. SHROPSHIRE
as 6:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Respondent:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WORTHEN v. SHROPSHIRE
as 7:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Respondent:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WORTHEN v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
WALLACE ALLEN WORTHEN, JR
Defendant:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. YORK et al
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Defendant:
Officer YORK, HOCOMB, TAREL TODDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. YORK et al
as 7:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Defendant:
YORK, HOCOMB, TAREL TODDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
TREVIS WORTHEN
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmond v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Quinton Edmond
Defendant:
Warden Brooks L. Benton, Dr. Olatunji Awe, Nurse Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Worthen, Jr. v. West Central Georgia Regional Hospital, et al
as 22-13504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE ALLEN WORTHEN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL and TRIGLER HUNTER
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
WALLACE ALLEN WORTHEN, JR
Respondent:
WEST CENTRAL GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL and TRIGLER HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
