Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hook v. McCray et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. McCray et al
as 1:2020cv21767
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. Now, R.M.C. Colonel, Dr. Sharma and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Hook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa v. City of Naples, Florida et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Julio N. Rosa
Defendant:
City of Naples, Florida, Collier County Sheriff Office, Kevin Rambosk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Sexual Assault Response Center et al
as 3:2016cv01088
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Richardson
Defendant:
Sexual Assault Response Center, Ian S Caccam and Cheryl Bibbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Sexual Assault Response Center et al
as 3:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Reginald K. Richardson
Defendant:
Sexual Assault Response Center, Ian S Caccam and Cheryl Bibbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinds v. Miami Dade Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv22332
Plaintiff:
Erick Jamal Hinds
Defendant:
Miami Dade Police Department, Special Response Team, James Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
