Cases 1 - 10 of 17,198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gozo v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01270
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01228
Petitioner:
Jordale King
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrick v. Dean, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Larnell E. Hendrick
Defendant:
Robert Dean, Jr., Lieutnant Ahmed, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Scott Shellenberger, States Attorney Michael Fuller and States Attorney Michelle Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
