Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
United States of America v. $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04858
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A., Approximately $297,000 on Deposit at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, One 2005 Bentley Continental, Vin SCBCR63W15C025200, Florida Vehicle Reg. No. PDF5C and others
Claimant: Annette Bongiorno, Rudy Bongiorno and Hudson City Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Hirschfeld et al v. Czala et al
as 1:2010cv02872
Plaintiff: Elie Hirschfeld
Defendant: Richard F. Czala and Gregg Wolpert
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Richard F. Czala and Gregg Wolpert
Thirdparty_defendant: Ethel J. Griffin, Internal Revenue Service , New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hirschfeld et al v. Czala et al
as 1:2010cv02871
Plaintiff: Elie Hirschfeld
Defendant: Richard F. Czala and Gregg Wolpert
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Richard F. Czala and Gregg Wolpert
Thirdparty_defendant: Ethel J. Griffin, Internal Revenue Service , New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. The premises and real property with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements, located at 35 Pierpont Street, Rochester, NY, that is, all that tract or parcel of land situated in the City of Roch
as 6:2009cv06671
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The premises and real property with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements, located at 35 Pierpont Street, Rochester, NY, that is, all that tract or parcel of land situated in the City of Roch
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property Located at 8-10 Thomas Street, City of Kingston, County of Ulster, New York
as 1:2009cv00479
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property Located at 8-10 Thomas Street, City of Kingston, County of Ulster, New York
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Lesch v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00077
Petitioner: Anthony R. Lesch
Respondent: United States of America, State of New York and City of Binghamton, New York
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bermudez v. City of New York Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv09537
Plaintiff: Gustavo Bermudez
Defendant: City of New York Police Department and The United States Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. One 2002 Nissan Maxima, bearing VIN # JN1DA31D62T202198, et al
as 6:2007cv06362
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One 2002 Nissan Maxima bearing VIN #JN1DA31D62T202198, One 2004 Nissan Mixima, bearing VIN # 1N4BA41E24C878255, $77,038.00 seized from 303 Sawyer Street, Rochester, NY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. The real property and premises located at 4 Emerald Court, Moriches, New York, and all proceeds traceable thereto et al
as 2:2007cv00276
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant: The real property and premises located at 4 Emerald Court, Moriches, New York, and all proceeds traceable thereto, New York Commercial Bank Account Number 601011553 held in the name of Linda E. Castellano in trust for Angelina E. and James V. Castellano, up to an including the sum of $5,000, and all proceeds, New York Commercial Bank Account Number 610013115 held in the name of Linda E. Castellano, up to and including the sum of $220,000, and all proceeds traceable thereto and others
Claimant: National City Bank
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?