Cases 11 - 17 of 17
USA v. Approx. $53,950.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2023mc00415
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $53,950.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $6,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Adriana Jones
United States of America v. Approximately $380,050.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2019mc00115
Defendant:
Approximately $6,110.13 seized from Wells Fargo Bank, Approximately $2,082.97 seized from Travis Credit Union, Approximately $80,000.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
Cuc Thi Schaeffer, Kimberly Santiago Robinson, John Acosta and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $112,700.00 in U.S. Currency
as 8:2014cv01701
Defendant:
$112,700.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Latasha Lee Jones
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Lycurgan, Inc. v. Jones
as 3:2014cv01679
Plaintiff:
Lycurgan, Inc. and Lycurgan, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Ares Armor
Defendant:
Todd Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Of America v. 25,000 in United States Currency
as 3:2010cv04859
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
25,000 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Deborah Barnes and Daryl Jones
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $13,790.00 In U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2009cv04898
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$13,790.00 In U.S. Currency and 12 Assorted Money Orders Valued at $6,000.00
Claimant:
Dedrick Jones
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property - Drugs
Type:
Forfeiture / Penalty
United States of America v. $92,140.00 in US Currency
as 2:2007cv02368
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$92,140.00 in US Currency, One 1990 Chaparral Vessel and One 2001 Ford Excursion
Claimant:
Erik D Jones
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
