Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. One 2004 Ford F-150, VIN #1FTPW12554KD12613, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon et al
as 2:2014cv02416
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One 2004 Ford F-150, VIN #1FTPW12554KD12613, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Claimant:
Victor Orrin Wright and Wells Fargo Dealer Services
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 2400 Wade Hampton Boulevard, Greeneville, South Carolina
as 3:2012cv00461
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 2400 Wade Hampton Blvd., Greenville, SC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
F. Scott Milligan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee, 4676 Highway 41N, Springfield, Tennessee, 204 Lawrence Lane, Springfield, Tennessee and others
Claimant:
Marie Murphy, in her capacity as Special Deputy Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance for the State of Tennessee, and as Statutory Liquidator/Receiver of Smart Data Solutions, LLC, et. al , F&M Bank , Bart S Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 2005 Ford F-150 Supercrew Pickup Truck
as 3:2008cv01213
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
2005 Ford F-150 Supercrew Pickup Truck
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Gipson v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 2:2007cv02153
Petitioner:
Jason F. Gipson
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Agency, $17,495.00 in U.S. Currency, Assorted Electronic Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
