Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Puerto Rico
USA v. 1.One Genuine Mens Rolex Watch, Submariner Style, 41MM, Sapphire Crystal, Blue Ceramic Bezel Blue Dial, Serial No. 386U64F7 et al
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 1). ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLUE CERAMIC BEZEL BLUE DIAL, SERIAL NO. 386U64F7;, [2] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, STAINLESS STEEL & 18K YELLOW GOLD, SERIAL NO. 42DM7808;, [3] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLACK DIAL W/CERAMIC BLACK BEZEL, SERIAL NO. 554825R6; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699
as 3:2022cv01352
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $302,158.50 SEIZED FROM BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN 8699
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. Account Number 224120715 from Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
as 3:2014cv01129
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Account Number 224120715 From Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $85,478.81 in U.S. Currency in Account Number XXXXX3335 from Banco Popular de Puerto Rico in the name of Aluwest Industries, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01932
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $85,478.81 in U.S. Currency in Account Number XXXXX3335 from Banco Popular de Puerto Rico in the name of Aluwest Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Farmacia Carimas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv01809
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Farmacia Carimas, Farmacia Boneville, Urb. Villa del Rio Este, E-10 Secc Dos Rios and others
Claimant: Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Banco Santander Puerto Rico, RG Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?