Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States of America v. $7,670.81 Seized from Treasury Department Federal Credit Union Checking Account #2001859900
as 8:2012cv02132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,670.81 Seized from Treasury Department Federal Credit Union Checking Account #2001859900
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $40,041.20 in U.S. Currency seized from State Department Federal Credit Union Account number XXX786
as 8:2012cv01771
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$40,041.20 in U.S. Currency seized from State Department Federal Credit Union Account number XXX786
Claimant:
Lucille F. Thomas-Davis
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Wiebe et al v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2011cv03245
Plaintiff:
John K. Wiebe, William E. Binney, Diane S. Roark and others
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Greg Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al
as 8:2011cv00601
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gamache
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
USA v. $34,052.29 Seized from Aberdeen Proving Grounds et al
as 1:2009cv03486
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$34,052.29 Seized from Aberdeen Proving Grounds FCU, $5,510.00 in U.S. Currency, $6,758.09 Seized from Cecil Federal Bank/Columbian Bank CD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 615 Bayshore Court # 5, Boat Slip # 5, Ocean City, Maryland 21842 et al
as 1:2008cv00823
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
615 Bayshore Court # 5, Boat Slip # 5, Ocean City, Maryland 21842 and $126,720 Contained in Arundel Federal Savings Bank Account 11033859
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
