Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Ten Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($10,355.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2019cv01781
Defendant:
$164,594.47 from First Merchants Bank Business Checking Account No. xxxx0003, held in the name of Towfiq Market, LLC, Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ($18,650.00) in United States Currency, Ten Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Five and 00/100 Dollars ($10,355.00) in United States Currency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars US Currency ($9,580.00) et al
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars US Currency ($9,580.00), Five Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars US Currency ($525), Sun City Machinery, Model Stevens 320, 12 Gauge Shotgun, SN: 130884E and others
Claimant:
Jay P Bakhshi
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 387615.00 in US Currency
as 3:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
387615.00 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Race Horse Named Shanon Nicole Net Sale Proceeds in the amount of 195772.50 et al
as 3:2015cv00143
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Race Horse Named Shanon Nicole Net Sale Proceeds in the amount of 195772.50, Race Horse Named Baryshnikov Net Sale Proceeds in the amount of 3900.50, Zia Park Racetrack Net Racing Proceeds in the amount of 27548.00 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. 2001 Bennington Pontoon Boat with Trailer in the name of Deanna Leis HIN ETW10203K001 et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2001 Bennington Pontoon Boat with Trailer in the name of Deanna Leis HIN ETW10203K001, 1998 Godfrey Rinker Boat with Trailer in the name of Deanna Leis HIN RNK573201798, US Bank Account #0449 in the name of Deanna Leis in the amount of 29,212.89 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $19,388.69 Seized from US Bank Account #xxxxxxxx5870
as 1:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$19,388.69 Seized from US Bank Account #xxxxxxxx5870
Interested_party:
David Donadeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Account 4080 GE Capital Bank In the name of Wilson Barangirana In the amount of 200452.94 et al
as 3:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Account 4080 GE Capital Bank In the name of Wilson Barangirana In the amount of 200452.94, Account 6203 Wright Patt Credit Union In the name of Wilson Barangirana In the amount of 54796.94 and 4700.00 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. RP 2230 Park Avenue Cincinnati Ohio, Real Property Located at et al
as 1:2013cv00535
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
RP 2230 Park Avenue Cincinnati Ohio, Real Property Located at, Contents of US Bank xx5618 in the name of Queen City Investment Fund II, Contents of US Bank x8448 in the name of Queen City Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Real Property Known As 243 Hornwood Drive Dayton OH 45405 et al
as 3:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known As 243 Hornwood Drive Dayton OH 45405, 2008 Mercedes Benz R350 VIN 4JGCB65E88A063234 and 2811 US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 3492 Riva Court Beavercreek OH 45430 et al
as 3:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known as 3492 Riva Court Beavercreek OH 45430, 2004 Ford Mustang VIN 1FAFP42R24F216739, 2005 Pontiac GTO VIN 6G2VX12U95L462299 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
