Cases 121 - 130 of 887
Blazek et al v. Shared Services Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. and Shared Services Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Molly Blazek and Sam J. Teeters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2020cv03024
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Scott T. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yant Testing, Supply & Equipment Co. v. Lakner, Jr.
as 8:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Yant Testing, Supply & Equipment Co.
Defendant:
David A. Lakner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, Division, IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, Division, IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 153
Unum Life Insurance Company v. Ebberson et al
as 8:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Marvin L. Young, Ar. Y., A. Y. and others
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintentance of Way Employes, Division, IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 153
Gardner v. Sam's West, Inc., et al
as 8:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Sam's West, Inc, and Regina Gardner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pekney v. The Fort, Inc.
as 4:2020cv03010
Defendant:
The Fort, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Pekney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miko v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 8:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ann Miko
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Schneider v. Laminated Wood Systems, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00021
Defendant:
LAMINATED WOOD SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Allison Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
