Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Austin v. Hattie B's, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00980
Defendant:
Hattie B's, LLC, Hattie B's of Middle TN, LLC and Hattie B's of West TN, LLC
Plaintiff:
Amy Austin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Amaquiton v. Goodman Company LP
as 4:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Amy E Amaquiton
Defendant:
Goodman Company LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Amaquiton v. Goodman Company, L.P.
as 4:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Amy E Amaquiton
Defendant:
Goodman Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wallin et al v. Jabaley et al (PLR1)
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Eloise Wallin , Angela Wallin and Amy Walker
Defendant:
Charles Jabaley and Rebecca Jabaley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Garrett et al v. Cardin Drive-In, Inc. et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Garrett , Amy Grubb , Jennifer Patrick and others
Defendant:
Cardin Drive-In, Inc. and Wilma Jean Cardin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris et al v. National Health Corporation
as 3:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Amy S. Harris and Jenny Teeples
Defendant:
National Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alford v. Army et al
as 2:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Amy Alford
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Honorable John McHugh and Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Moore et al v. Hardin County General Hospital
as 1:2013cv01297
Plaintiff:
Mary Moore and Amy Brown
Defendant:
Hardin County General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sherrod v. Matlock Enterprises, L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Sherrod
Defendant:
Matlock Enterprises, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Coppess v. Healthways, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Coppess and Douglas J. Coppess
Defendant:
Healthways, Inc., Ben R. Leedle, Jr., Thomas G. Cigarran and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
