Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Morris v. Spiritrust Lutheran
as 1:2016cv01968
Plaintiff:
Deborah Morris
Defendant:
Spiritrust Lutheran
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
MORRIS v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv02584
Plaintiff:
MEGAN MORRIS
Defendant:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WORTHEN v. DUANE MORRIS LLP
as 2:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
VALERIE WORTHEN
Defendant:
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Morris v. CK Franchising, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Morris
Defendant:
CK Franchising, Inc., MD Enterprises LLC and Marlin Duncan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORRIS v. PJPA, LLC
as 2:2014cv04055
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
PJPA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
MOSES v. M. DAVIS & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00575
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MOSES
Defendant:
M. DAVIS & COMPANY, INC. and MORRIS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
HENDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03534
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HENDERSON , KIM ANDERSON , AKBAR GBAJABIAMILA and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MORRIS v. UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 4889 et al
as 2:2008cv03398
Plaintiff:
JAMES MORRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 4889 and U.S. STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P v. CHARLES MORRIS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2007cv01144
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, DISTRICT 1199P
Defendant:
CHARLES MORRIS NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
