Cases 11 - 20 of 307
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC doing business as UC Health, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022oe00065
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Neack v. UC Health, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Neack
Defendant:
UC Health, LLC, UC Health Retirement Plan and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gonzalez v. Standard Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv02091
Plaintiff:
Martin E Gonzalez and Martin E. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Johnson v. Dodds Bodyworks, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04995
Plaintiff:
Harold J Johnson and Harold Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Dodds Bodyworks, Inc., 6340 E Main LLC, 6350 E Main LLC and others
Miller v. Baltimore Builders Supply & Millwork, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04867
Plaintiff:
Devon Miller
Defendant:
Baltimore Builders Supply & Millwork, Inc., Hometown Hardwares, Inc., Ashville Ace Hardware and others
Big Lots Inc. v. Randy E. Pandell
as 2:2021cv03943
Plaintiff:
Big Lots Inc.
Defendant:
Randy E. Pandell, Susan Rigby, Ridell & Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Big Lots Inc. v. Randy E. Pandell
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Big Lots Inc.
Defendant:
Randy E. Pandell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fassa v. P&E Express Inc.
as 2:2021cv00542
Defendant:
P&E Express Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cheikh Fassa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ruehlman v. E. G. Meiners Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00903
Plaintiff:
Richard Ruehlman
Defendant:
Edward Meiners, III, Doe Corporation 1-10, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
