Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Dickerson v. Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dickerson
Defendant:
Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. and Priscilla B. Faulkner
Gai v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Fatimatou Gai
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Espy et al v. Savannah Restaurant Associates, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Troy Espy and Eric Cornelle
Defendant:
Savannah Restaurant Associates, Inc. doing business as Belford's Seafood and Steaks, Kevin McPherson, Marcie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sheehan v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sheehan
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Fleming-Armstrong v. Superior Surgical Associates, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03935
Plaintiff:
Santasha Fleming-Armstrong
Defendant:
Superior Surgical Associates, Inc.
Sartain v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 1:2021cv04192
Plaintiff:
Raven Sartain
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cloer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Amy Cloer
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOLLIS v. BARKSDALE & ASSOCIATES INC
as 1:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
COREY D HOLLIS
Defendant:
BARKSDALE & ASSOCIATES INC and BARKSDALE & ASSOCIATES INC doing business as TSG INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Collins v. BTS & Sons Associates, Inc et al
as 6:2020cv00089
Defendant:
BTS & Sons Associates, Inc and South East Personnel Leasing, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dustin Collins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
