Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Dominguez v. Cattlemens Bank
as 3:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Dylan Dominguez
Defendant:
Cattlemens Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Neff v. Frost Bank
as 5:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Neff
Defendant:
Frost Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Owens v. Crescent Bank & Trust Corporation
as 3:2021cv02652
Plaintiff:
Sharon Owens
Defendant:
Crescent Bank & Trust Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Stidom v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2021cv01389
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kendrick Demon Stidom and Kendrick Demon Stidom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BOKF, N.A. d/b/a Bank of Texas v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv01790
Plaintiff:
BOKF, N.A. d/b/a Bank of Texas and BOKF, N.A. doing business as Bank of Texas
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bokf, N.A. v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv01449
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
BOKF, N.A. dba BANK OF TEXAS and BOKF, N.A doing business as Bank of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Crane v. Hancock Whitney Bank
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Plaintiff:
Catherine Crane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vercollone v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 4:2021cv00208
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
John Vercollone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Scherer v. BOK Financial Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv00449
Defendant:
BOKF, N.A. d/b/a Bank of Texas, BOK Financial Corporation and BOFK, N.A. doing business as Bank of Texas
Plaintiff:
Cori Alexandra Scherer
Haggard v. Regions Bank
as 5:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
J. Haggard
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
