Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Cathy Haines et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 5:2015cv01154
Plaintiff:
Alane Barnes Garvik and Cathy Haines
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ASO Michael L Wolfram
Defendant:
Transcend Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oquendo et al v. Comerica Bank et al
as 3:2015cv01586
Plaintiff:
Sol Oquendo and Kenneth Edmonson
Defendant:
Comerica Bank , Cathy Hedges and John Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sol et al v. Comerica Bank et al
as 3:2015cv01585
Plaintiff:
Oquendo Sol and Edmonson Kenneth
Defendant:
Comerica Bank, Cathy Hedges and Fitzgerald John
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Camille Armstead et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05675
Plaintiff:
Camille Armstead, Gerry Chamberlain, Terence Klafke and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Bobby Duckworth et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2013cv04718
Plaintiff:
Vince Albritton, Darla Anderson, Fred Anderson and others
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Compeau v. Unisys Corporation
as 4:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Cathy Compeau
Defendant:
Unisys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Birdsong v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv06175
Plaintiff:
Cathy Birdsong
Defendant:
AT&T Corp. , AT&T Services, Inc. , AT&T Management Services LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reynolds et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Cathy A. Reynolds , Rhys Hoskins , R. W. Reynolds and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saul Jimenez v. Cathy Jean Inc et al
as 8:2011cv01620
Defendant:
Cathy Jean Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Saul Jimenez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
