Cases 11 - 20 of 45
BROWN v. MJH HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv13283
Defendant:
ROBERT GOLDSMITH, MJH ASSOCIATES, INC., MICHAEL J. HENNESSY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH M. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARTIN et al v. MSK MANAGEMENT, LLC. et al
as 2:2018cv11874
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BRISLAWN and JOSEPH MARTIN
Defendant:
BOONTON PIZZA CORPORATION, ELIZABETH PIZZA CORPORATION, 461 SPRINGFIELD AVE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HAHM v. SAM HAK FOOD CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv08270
Plaintiff:
SANGHOON HAHM
Defendant:
SAM HAK FOOD CORP., JA KWAN KOO and ELIZABETH KWON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
OGLE v. ALTMAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH OGLE
Defendant:
ALTMAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MCGOURTY v. PORT ELIZABETH TERMINAL WAREHOUSE CORP.
as 2:2018cv01392
Plaintiff:
PETER MCGOURTY
Defendant:
PORT ELIZABETH TERMINAL WAREHOUSE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVIS v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2017cv08189
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DAVIS
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVIS v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 2:2017cv08190
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DAVIS
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JONES v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06488
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH JONES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC and JOHN DOE INDIVIDUALS AND/OR BUSINESS ENTITIES (PLURAL 1-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
AZZARELLI v. RUTGERS
as 2:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH AZZARELLI
Defendant:
RUTGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CANON v. MORRISTOWN MOTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CANON
Defendant:
MORRISTOWN MOTORS, INC., JOHN BRAUER and ELIZABETH BRAUER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
