Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2014cv03989
Plaintiff:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
as 1:2014cv02027
Plaintiff:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Garrison v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv03014
Plaintiff:
Sandra Garrison
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lax v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
William Lax
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Jenkins v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Gilbert R. Jenkins
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Kelly v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 1:2008cv01052
Plaintiff:
Orin K Kelly
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clayton v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 1:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
William Clayton
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 1:2007cv03950
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
