Cases 11 - 20 of 29
MONTOLLA v. MEHALE LTD., INC.
as 2:2017cv04020
Plaintiff:
JOSE MONTOLLA
Defendant:
MEHALE LTD., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Seijas v. MMODAL Services, LTD., Inc.
as 8:2017cv01116
Plaintiff:
Michelle Seijas
Defendant:
MMODAL Services, LTD., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seijas v. MMODAL Services, LTD., Inc.
as 5:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
Michelle Seijas
Defendant:
MMODAL Services, LTD., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LEON v. SANTANA CREATIVE LTD, INC.
as 1:2015cv23898
Plaintiff:
MARISABEL LEON
Defendant:
SANTANA CREATIVE LTD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Dietz-Clark v. HDR, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Vivian Dietz-Clark
Defendant:
HDR, Inc., HDR LTD Inc. Plan and United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AYOUB v. VILLA ENTERPRISES HOLDING CORP. et al
as 3:2013cv05675
Plaintiff:
ASHRAF AYOUB
Defendant:
VILLA ENTERPRISES HOLDING CORP. , VILLA ENTERPRISES HOLDING, LLC , VILLA ENTERPRISES LTD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Amando Morales, et al v. Ryco Construction Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv06554
Plaintiff:
Juan Ugalde and Amando Morales
Defendant:
Ryco Construction Company, Inc., Ryan Taheny, Colin Taheny and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mercado v. Ryco Construction Company, Inc. d/b/a Ryco Landscaping, Cory Properties, Ltd, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06877
Plaintiff:
Felix Mercado
Defendant:
Ryco Construction Company, Inc. d/b/a Ryco Landscaping, Cory Properties, Ltd, Inc., Ryan Taheny and Taheny Colin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Sundial Ltd., Inc.
as 8:2010cv00527
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Sundial Ltd., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Morang v. Brickman Group LTD, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00329
Plaintiff:
Richard Morang and Richard Morang
Defendant:
Brickman Group LTD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
