Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Perez v. FCJ, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv11441
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
FCJ, LLC and Frederick Jaffe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Smolinsky v. Department of Labor
as 1:2016cv10840
Petitioner:
Christopher Smolinsky
Respondent:
Thomas Perez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. United Comb and Novelty Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv40047
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
United Comb and Novelty Corporation , Edward W. Zephir , Gregory Pojani and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Secretary of Labor of the United States v. Page et al
as 4:2016cv10513
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Kenneth Page and Page Electrical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Secretary of Labor of the United States v. Zeus Packaging, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10442
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Zeus Packaging, Inc., Cape Ann Seafood Exchange and Kristian Kristensen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Local Union 26, Unite Here
as 1:2016cv10396
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LOCAL UNION 26, UNITE HERE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Perez et al v. MARK Foods, Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10019
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perez
Defendant:
MARK Foods, Enterprises, Inc., Sofia's Food Enterprise Corp., Zina Maria Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller et al v. River St. Grill, Inc.
as 1:2015cv14233
Plaintiff:
Antwan Miller , Abigail White and Tainairis Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
River St. Grill, Inc., Gail Tsolirides and George Tsolirides
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Jagminas
as 1:2015cv13051
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Eugenijus R Jagminas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Royal Environmental Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11752
Defendant:
Royal Environmental Services, Inc. , Marci A Siegel and Brian S Leibovitz
Plaintiff:
Balbina Jeronimo Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
