Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Atkins v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Melinda Atkins
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Angela Ann Patterson, Jason Rosso and Melinda Atkins
Counter_claimant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. TUTTO ROSSO INDUSTRIAL DEMOLITION
as 2:2010cv05901
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
TUTTO ROSSO INDUSTRIAL DEMOLITION
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Rivas v. Rosso Enterprises Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv09564
Plaintiff:
Johnny Rivas
Defendant:
Rosso Enterprises Corp., Baudo Alberto, Valerio Rubino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mark Brown v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 09-2524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Brown, on behalf of himself and a class of persons similarly situated
Movant:
Christine Wright and Kathy Breiwick
Defendant - Appellee:
Medtronic, Inc., Carol A. McCormick, The Qualified Plan Committee of Medtronic, Inc. and others
Wright v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christin A. Wright, Christin A. Wright, Kathy L. Breiwick and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Arthur D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brown v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv04904
Plaintiff:
Mark Brown, Mark Brown, Mark Brown and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., William A. Hawkins, Carol A. McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ROSSO et al v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv05845
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. ROSSO and GAIL M. ROSSO
Defendant:
DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION and AETNA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
