Cases 21 - 30 of 49
PRZENKOP v. TC Payroll, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv14265
Defendant:
TC Payroll, LLC and IGOR PIMENTEL
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA PRZENKOP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Topete et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2018at00444
Plaintiff:
Hector Topete , Estuardo Ruiz , Juan Perez and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Topete et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Hector Topete , Estuardo Ruiz , Juan Perez and others
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ibarra Perez et al v. 149 Street Food Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv03560
Plaintiff:
Hildeberto Ibarra Perez and Santiago Hernandez
Defendant:
149 Street Food Corp. , 675 Morris Ave Food Corp. , Frank Pimentel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pimentel et al v. Bonsall et al
as 3:2018cv01958
Plaintiff:
Rolando Pimentel and Zacharias Salas
Defendant:
Robert Bonsall and Beeson, Tayer, Bodine LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alcantara et al v. DPL Construction,Inc et al
as 1:2018cv20014
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alcantara
Defendant:
DPL Construction Inc. , Daniel Lora Pimentel and Power Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ernesto Jimenez et al v. BMC West, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00571
Defendant:
BMC West, LLC, Thomas Coronado, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Garcia, Ernesto Jimenez, Miguel Martinez and others
Pimentel et al v. CC Last Mile, LLC
as 8:2017cv00652
Plaintiff:
Angel Pimentel and Edil Morales
Defendant:
CC Last Mile, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pimentel v. Astor EB-5 LLC et al
as 1:2016cv25149
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Pimentel
Defendant:
David J. Hart and Astor EB-5 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Alvarez v. Pimentel et al
as 1:2016cv06329
Plaintiff:
Jesus Alvarez
Defendant:
Daniel Pimentel and Altagracia Deli and grocery Store No.2 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
