Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Garcia v. Turkish Corner, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02563
Defendant:
Zafer Bozkurton, Zafer Bozkurt, Seyran Say and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Villa Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. Wireless Boys, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00718
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Wireless Boys, LLC, Basam A Sayed, Basam A. Sayed and others
Argueta v. Om Sai Ram, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ana Argueta
Defendant:
Om Sai Ram, Inc., Vijay Mhera, Sonoo Chandar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01693
Defendant:
Sai Ching Chan, Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. d/b/a'He Ping Restaurant' and Sou Qin Chen
Plaintiff:
Tian Yi Yang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chan v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01651
Defendant:
Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc., d/b/a "He Ping Restaurant",, Tianyi Yang and Sou Qin Chen
Plaintiff:
Sai Ching Chan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 5542
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Sai Ching Chan, Sou Qin Chen and Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tian Xi Yang
Yang v. Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00812
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Tian Yi Yang, Sai Ching Chan, Shanghai Heping Restaurant Inc. and others
Chan v. Yang et al
as 1:2020cv00773
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Tian Yi Yang, Sai Ching Chan, He Ping Restaurant, Inc. and others
ALVAREZ v. HUBALOU, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00098
Defendant:
HUBALOU, LLC, MONEER AHMAD SIDIQI, MED LAHLOU and others
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Labranche v. $49.99 Sewer Man, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06005
Plaintiff:
Claudel Labranche
Defendant:
$49.99 Sewer Man, Inc. and Sayed Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
