Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis et al v. Maury Regional Hospital
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Alice Davis , Debora Turnbo and Teresa Riley
Defendant:
Maury Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis et al v. Patel et al
as 3:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis and Janice Carter Davis
Defendant:
Samunka Patel, Pinal Patel and Manish Kumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dodge v. Jay's Family Restaurant et al
as 3:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dodge
Defendant:
Jay's Family Restaurant , Charlotte Davis and David Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
Susan T. Davis
Defendant:
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis v. Portrait innovations
as 2:2014cv02022
Plaintiff:
Cinnamon Davis
Defendant:
Portrait innovations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Davis v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01091
Plaintiff:
Mary Davis
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC and Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2013cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tammy Davis
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Davis v. Damron Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01256
Plaintiff:
Billie Diane Davis
Defendant:
Damron Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ingram v. State of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development et al
as 3:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Ingram
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Karla Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
