Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Vaulton v. Evinco Professional Services, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2017cv00269
Defendant:
Evinco Professional Services, Inc. , Charles B Smith and James Curtis Maynard
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Vaulton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Smith
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. Matix Corporation of America
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Smith
Defendant:
Matix Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. WDE Group, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 3:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
WDE Group, Inc., Jamison Kuhn Enterprises, Inc. and Jamison Kuhn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Johnson v. D&M Underground, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
D&M Underground, LLC and Bryan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. JRC Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Merrie Smith
Defendant:
JRC Ventures, Inc. , Jacque R Collett and 24-7 Bright Star Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Crossville BNRV Sales, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Crossville BNRV Sales, LLC, GA BNRV Sales and Derwood Littlefield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reeser v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Whitney Paxton and Jeff Reeser
Defendant:
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc , Phillip Hicks and Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Archer v. Nabors Truck Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02610
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Archer
Defendant:
Nabors Truck Service, Inc. and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Smith v. Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, P.A. et al
as 3:2016cv01674
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, P.A. and Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
